Sussex Boy wrote: |
Harry Kewell????? Is this a joke...
Total disaster waiting to happen... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
TownMeadLeftover wrote: |
Why don't some of you moaners come up with some names then? who on earth do any of you think is going to come and manage a minnow club with very little money or support?
You can start by naming all the managers currently on the dole and then explain why all those sacked failures will suddenly come good at Crawley If it is to be Kewell then why is he such a bad choice against all those failures? |
Red, Red & Red wrote: |
HK lacks experience so would be another gamble just like the dummy. Player/manager would be slightly more attractive but really its a manager as priority we need. If it is HK and its a big if just rumour mill nothing less presently then i hope its in a very short contract to end 2017 max as if gamble flops we need boot the manager out. CRITICAL no excuses is manager has to get best out of a squad of misfits assembled by clowns. We need a circus master. |
thad wrote: |
Just to get the matter out of the way... Harry Kewell is a loud mouthed big-head who will blame everyone else if anything goes wrong...
...I've never met him, but all Aussie blokes are like that..! ![]() |
Mr.T. wrote: | ||
Careful thad,the P.C. brigade will be onto you.....racist |
Crawley69 wrote: |
Seems Eren is a sucker for a shot in the dark. Not sure what in Kewells past qualifies him to be a manager other than he was a decent footballer 20 years ago and is a snappy dresser. Can't see this ending well. The main thing I remember about him was his managers complaining he would not want to play unless 100 percent fiit. The slightest knock and he was in the physio room. |
Martin(Kent Branch) wrote: | ||
No, no, no. Kewell = back to non-league. S |
Ian wrote: | ||||
On what basis? |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT + 1 Hour