A little more Non League...
Select messages from
# through # FAQ
[/[Print]\]
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  :| |:
CTFC.net Fans Forum -> -> Talk football

#136:  Author: Simon PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2017 4:45 am
    —
So it appears the player had a sine die ban due to an unpaid fine of 10 when at Fisher which he was unaware of (seriously, who risks a sine die ban for a tenner?).

When he signed for HH some time later the ban was not listed on FA websites but appeared some time later although the club and player had no reason to check.

Showcasing the FA at its best, clearly....

#137:  Author: nemo PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2017 5:04 pm
    —
Simon wrote:
So it appears the player had a sine die ban due to an unpaid fine of 10 when at Fisher which he was unaware of (seriously, who risks a sine die ban for a tenner?).

When he signed for HH some time later the ban was not listed on FA websites but appeared some time later although the club and player had no reason to check.

Showcasing the FA at its best, clearly....

HH have appealed the leagues decision.

#138:  Author: Simon PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2017 5:16 pm
    —
nemo wrote:
Simon wrote:
So it appears the player had a sine die ban due to an unpaid fine of 10 when at Fisher which he was unaware of (seriously, who risks a sine die ban for a tenner?).

When he signed for HH some time later the ban was not listed on FA websites but appeared some time later although the club and player had no reason to check.

Showcasing the FA at its best, clearly....

HH have appealed the leagues decision.


I am sure the prawn sandwiches have been organised for the meeting.

#139:  Author: nemo PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2017 1:33 am
    —
Simon wrote:
nemo wrote:
Simon wrote:
So it appears the player had a sine die ban due to an unpaid fine of 10 when at Fisher which he was unaware of (seriously, who risks a sine die ban for a tenner?).

When he signed for HH some time later the ban was not listed on FA websites but appeared some time later although the club and player had no reason to check.

Showcasing the FA at its best, clearly....

HH have appealed the leagues decision.


I am sure the prawn sandwiches have been organised for the meeting.

Ha wonder if it will be held at Lancing FC who fielded an ineligible player in last season's Peter Bentley Cup Final and were never sanctioned?!



CTFC.net Fans Forum -> -> Talk football


output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  :| |:
Page 10 of 10

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group